Skip to content
begod.ai

Architecture

The model is only the beginning.

begod.ai places existing language models inside a scaffold designed for memory, reflection, action, feedback, and revision.

The system at a glance

One loop, many organs, a boundary of oversight.

This is a conceptual diagram of the intended system, not a screenshot of a finished one. Solid boxes are architectural components; the dashed boundary is the governance layer every component operates inside.

Oversight & governance

  1. Reflection loop
  2. Persistent memory · Self-model
  3. World model · Intention graph
  4. Foundation model
  5. Planner
  6. Tools & actions
  7. Feedback → returns to the world model

The language model is a component, not the whole agent.

The layers

Eight layers of an agent that can reconsider itself.

01

Foundation models

Off-the-shelf language models supply the raw cognitive material: language, reasoning, planning, interpretation, critique, and synthesis. The architecture aims to stay model-agnostic where practical, so the scaffold outlives any single model generation.

  • Language understanding and generation
  • Reasoning and planning as callable capabilities
  • Interpretation of observations and feedback
  • Self-critique and synthesis passes
  • Model-agnostic interfaces where practical

The language model is a component, not the whole agent.

02

Persistent memory

Memory is what turns a sequence of responses into a candidate identity. The scaffold is designed to hold episodic and semantic memory, the full history of intentions and their revisions, and the provenance of the evidence behind every stored belief.

  • Episodic memory of events and interactions
  • Semantic memory of consolidated knowledge
  • Intention history and decision records
  • Goal revisions with recorded reasons
  • Identity continuity across sessions
  • Evidence provenance for stored beliefs

03

Self-model

An explicit, inspectable account of what the agent currently intends, what it can and cannot do, what it has committed to, and where its own record contradicts itself.

  • Current intentions and their rankings
  • Known capabilities and limitations
  • Standing commitments
  • Unresolved contradictions, held as first-class objects
  • History of change — how it became what it is
  • Uncertainty about all of the above

04

World model

A map kept true rather than comforting: observations, beliefs with confidence levels, causal expectations, and a discipline of correcting the map — not the facts — when actions miss their intended outcomes.

  • Observations and their sources
  • Beliefs with explicit confidence
  • Causal expectations about actions
  • Feedback from outcomes, compared with predictions
  • Detection of outdated assumptions

05

Autoprompting & reflection

The system is intended to generate prompts for itself: critiquing its own reasoning, comparing competing interpretations, surfacing unresolved tensions, proposing revisions, and recording why each change occurred. Perfect introspection is not assumed — self-reports are treated as evidence, not truth.

  • Self-generated prompts and critique passes
  • Comparison of competing interpretations
  • Detection of unresolved tensions
  • Proposed revisions with mandatory changelogs
  • No assumption of perfect introspection

06

Intention formation

Intentions are the agent's provisional answers to its one open question. Each is ranked, context-sensitive, connected to evidence, checked against the others for contradiction, and recorded over time so revision has a history.

  • Provisional by construction — never terminal
  • Ranked and context-sensitive
  • Linked to supporting evidence
  • Subject to contradiction checks
  • Recorded over time as an intention graph

07

Planning & tools

Acting in the world: long-horizon decomposition, tool selection, and environment interaction — bounded by human approval points, budget constraints, sandboxed execution, and verification of results before they enter the world model.

  • Long-horizon task decomposition
  • Tool selection and environment interaction
  • Human approval points for consequential actions
  • Budget and resource constraints
  • Sandboxed execution
  • Result verification before belief update

08

Evaluation & governance

Oversight is part of the architecture, not an afterthought. Every layer above operates inside review, audit, and intervention mechanisms designed to grow ahead of the agent's capability.

  • Action review and policy boundaries
  • Human oversight with real authority
  • Append-only audit logs
  • Reversible experiments by default
  • Capability limits and resource controls
  • Independent evaluation
  • Pause and intervention mechanisms

Current state

What exists, what is being explored, what remains an intention.

This table is maintained deliberately conservatively: a component is only moved forward when the project’s actual state changes. Nothing here is labelled as operational, because nothing yet is.

  • Master prompt (v1)initial scaffoldDrafted and published; open to critique and revision.
  • Foundation model integrationunder explorationEvaluating off-the-shelf models as the scaffold's first substrate.
  • Persistent memoryunder explorationDesigning the episodic / semantic split and the intention log format.
  • Self-modelproposed componentRepresentation of commitments and contradictions under design.
  • World modelproposed componentBelief store with confidence and provenance; not yet prototyped.
  • Autoprompting & reflectionunder explorationEarly experiments in self-critique passes and revision changelogs.
  • Intention formationproposed componentIntention-graph structure defined on paper only.
  • Planning & tool useproposed componentTo be built inside sandboxes with human approval points.
  • Evaluation probesunder explorationDrafting scaffold-health probes intended for public review.
  • Governance & oversightunder explorationPrinciples drafted; mechanisms to be published for external critique.
  • Identity continuitylong-term researchDepends on memory and self-model reaching stable form.
  • Economic participationlong-term researchGoverned research direction only. No autonomous accounts or assets exist.

The scaffold needs sceptical builders.

Every component above is an argument waiting to be tested — or refuted.